Tesla zeigt es, Kobalt ist nicht mehr entscheidend zum Bau guter Batterien. Die Abkehr vom teuren Kobalt wird die Diskussion um schlechte Arbeitsbedingungen und Kinderarbeit in Kongo einschränken und Batterien langfristig günstiger machen.
I ron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which don’t use nickel or cobalt, are traditionally cheaper and safer, but they offer less energy density, which means less efficient and shorter range for electric vehicles.
Im aktuellen Quartals-Call hiess es dazu:
“Diversification of battery chemistries is critical for long-term capacity growth, to better optimize our products for their various use cases and expand our supplier base. This is why nearly half of Tesla vehicles produced in Q1 were equipped with a lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery, containing no nickel or cobalt. Currently, LFP batteries are used in most of our standard range vehicle products, as well as commercial energy storage applications. As a result of our energy efficient motors, a Model 3 with an LFP battery pack can still achieve a 267-mile EPA range.”
“I’ll take the LFP question. Like it says so in our letter, but half of our products were LFP last quarter, which shows how quickly we were able to respond. But honestly, it wasn’t because of a raw material shortage. It just seemed like the right thing to do. We could change our cathode chemistry. And there’s more to be done on the cathode side and we are actively pursuing it to give us substitution flexibility in response to market conditions between the other cathodes that are out there that can be competitive in our vehicle. There are many options.”
Tesla Inc US88160R1014
Tesla zeigt es, Batterien ohne Kobalt sind möglich!
Keine Kommentare
Bitte melden Sie sich an, um Kommentare hinzuzufügen